I take issue with only one point in this excellent analysis: The branches of government aren’t equal. The legislative is slightly more powerful than the others, as it has the power of the purse, it can fire anyone via impeachment (including presidents and judges), and it can create or eliminate federal agencies. Just because Congress chooses not to exercise its authority doesn’t mean it’s not there.
Yes, good point. It's also Article I of the Constitution, while the presidency is Article II, which indicates the Founders set it up as first among equals (or really, as you say, slightly more powerful than the others).
If anything, that makes Congress acting like it's subservient to the executive branch even worse.
I take issue with only one point in this excellent analysis: The branches of government aren’t equal. The legislative is slightly more powerful than the others, as it has the power of the purse, it can fire anyone via impeachment (including presidents and judges), and it can create or eliminate federal agencies. Just because Congress chooses not to exercise its authority doesn’t mean it’s not there.
Yes, good point. It's also Article I of the Constitution, while the presidency is Article II, which indicates the Founders set it up as first among equals (or really, as you say, slightly more powerful than the others).
If anything, that makes Congress acting like it's subservient to the executive branch even worse.
Agree.