"the National Institutes of Health (NIH)... reports that there’s “insufficient data … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19.”
Would that be the NIH run by Francis Collins, known to have been shilling for Fauci/ China, and smearing those who expressed suspicion along these lines?
See e.g. h…
"the National Institutes of Health (NIH)... reports that there’s “insufficient data … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19.”
Would that be the NIH run by Francis Collins, known to have been shilling for Fauci/ China, and smearing those who expressed suspicion along these lines?
OK, the bio shows him to be part of the Bulwark crowd, which is known, among those not enslaved to Establishment thought, to shill for NeoCon warmongers (e.g. w/ Kristol & Charen among its editors).
If this site is primarily also such a shill, I erred in subscribing to it.
That was written by Varad Mehta. That's the thing about our site: it's an avowedly pluralist publication. You'll enthusiastically agree with some of our articles, you'll find areas of agreement in other ones we post, and you'll positively hate still other ones we publish. If you're not looking for something like that, no hard feelings. But we make no apologies. Thanks for reading.
"the National Institutes of Health (NIH)... reports that there’s “insufficient data … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19.”
Would that be the NIH run by Francis Collins, known to have been shilling for Fauci/ China, and smearing those who expressed suspicion along these lines?
See e.g. https://www.newsweek.com/nih-director-dismissed-wuhan-lab-leak-1596765 .
Is there anything that he could do, which would at all dent his cred in the eyes of this Matt Johnson?
BTW, who is this Matt Johnson?
Why is there no bio info here on him?
There is a brief bio provided for every writer we publish. You just have to click on their names.
OK, the bio shows him to be part of the Bulwark crowd, which is known, among those not enslaved to Establishment thought, to shill for NeoCon warmongers (e.g. w/ Kristol & Charen among its editors).
If this site is primarily also such a shill, I erred in subscribing to it.
But, Cathy Young's mockery of the MSM (on Cheney) today gives me hope, that his site may not be such a shill.
That was written by Varad Mehta. That's the thing about our site: it's an avowedly pluralist publication. You'll enthusiastically agree with some of our articles, you'll find areas of agreement in other ones we post, and you'll positively hate still other ones we publish. If you're not looking for something like that, no hard feelings. But we make no apologies. Thanks for reading.
You're right about Mehta, I had a brain cramp.
Much of Ms. Young's stuff is *quite* worth reading.
I was drawn to here, by another site/s comparison of this one with Aero, etc.